code-server-2/docs/MAINTAINING.md

Maintaining

• Maintaining
  • Workflow
    • Milestones
    • Triage
    • Project Boards
  • Versioning
  • Pull Requests
    • Merge Strategies
    • Changelog
  • Release
    • Release Manager Rotation
    • Publishing a release

Maintaining

Current maintainers:

• @code-asher
• @oxy
• @jsjoeio

This document is meant to serve current and future maintainers of code-server, but also share openly our workflow for maintaining the project.

Workflow

The workflow used by code-server maintainers is one that aims to be easy to understood by the community and easy enough for new maintainers to jump in and start contributing on day one.

Milestones

We operate mainly using milestones. This was heavily inspired by our friends over at vscode.

Here are the milestones we use and how we use them:

• "Backlog" -> Work not yet planned for a specific release.
• "On Deck" -> Work under consideration for upcoming milestones.
• "Backlog Candidates" -> Work that is not yet accepted for the backlog. We wait for the community to weigh in.
• "<0.0.0>" -> Work to be done for that version.

With this flow, any un-assigned issues are essentially in triage state and once triaged are either "Backlog" or "Backlog Candidates". They will eventually move to "On Deck" (or be closed). Lastly, they will end up on a version milestone where they will be worked on.

Triage

We use the following process for triaging GitHub issues:

1. a submitter creates an issue
2. add appropriate labels
   1. if we need to look into it further, add "needs-investigation"
3. add to milestone
   1. if it should be fixed soon, add to version milestone or "On Deck"
   2. if not urgent, add to "Backlog"
   3. otherwise, add to "Backlog Candidate" if it should be considered

Project Boards

We use project boards for projects or goals that span multiple milestones.

Think of this as a place to put miscellaneous things (like testing, clean up stuff, etc). As a maintainer, random todos may come up here and there. This gives you a place to add notes temporarily before opening a new issue. Given that our release milestones function off of issues, we believe tasks should have dedicated issues.

It also gives us a way to separate the issue triage from bigger-picture, long-term work.

Versioning

<major.minor.patch>

The code-server project follows traditional semantic versioning, with the objective of minimizing major changes that break backward compatibility. We increment the patch level for all releases, except when the upstream Visual Studio Code project increments its minor version or we change the plugin API in a backward-compatible manner. In those cases, we increment the minor version rather than the patch level.

Pull Requests

Ideally, every PR should fix an issue. If it doesn't, make sure it's associated with a version milestone.

If a PR does fix an issue, don't add it to the version milestone. Otherwise, the version milestone will have duplicate information: the issue & the PR fixing the issue.

Merge Strategies

For most things, we recommend "Squash and Merge". If you're updating lib/vscode, we suggest using the "Rebase and Merge" strategy. There may be times where "Create a merge commit" makes sense as well. Use your best judgement. If you're unsure, you can always discuss in the PR with the team. The code-server project follows traditional semantic versioning, with the objective of minimizing major changes that break backward compatibility. We increment the patch level for all releases, except when the upstream Visual Studio Code project increments its minor version or we change the plugin API in a backward-compatible manner. In those cases, we increment the minor version rather than the patch level.

Changelog

To save time when creating a new release for code-server, we keep a running changelog at CHANGELOG.md.

If either author or reviewer of a PR believe the change should be mentioned in the CHANGELOG, then it should be added.

If there is not a "Next Version" when you modify CHANGELOG, please add it using the template you see near the top of CHANGELOG.

As for what you should write for your changelog item, we should asking yourself these two questions:

1. How do these changes affect code-server users?
2. What actions do they need to take? (if any)

If you need inspiration, we suggest looking at the Emacs changelog.

Release

Release Manager Rotation

With each release, we rotate the role of "release manager" to ensure every maintainer goes through the process. This helps us keep documentation up-to-date and encourages us to continually review and improve the flow with each set of eyes.

If you're the current release manager, follow these steps:

1. Create a release issue
2. Fill out checklist
3. After release is published, close release milestone

Publishing a release

1. Run yarn release:prep and type in the new version i.e. 3.8.1
2. GitHub actions will generate the npm-package, release-packages and release-images artifacts.
   1. You do not have to wait for these.
3. Run yarn release:github-draft to create a GitHub draft release from the template with the updated version.
   1. Summarize the major changes in the release notes and link to the relevant issues.
   2. Change the @ to target the version branch. Example: v3.9.0 @ Target: v3.9.0
4. Wait for the artifacts in step 2 to build.
5. Run yarn release:github-assets to download the release-packages artifact.
   • It will upload them to the draft release.
6. Run some basic sanity tests on one of the released packages.
   • Especially make sure the terminal works fine.
7. Publish the release and merge the PR.
   1. CI will automatically grab the artifacts and then:
      1. Publish the NPM package from npm-package.
      2. Publish the Docker Hub image from release-images.
8. Update the AUR package.
   • Instructions on updating the AUR package are at cdr/code-server-aur.
9. Wait for the npm package to be published.